Douglas
Rushkoff is a renowned author, documentarian, and academic. His books and
documentaries cover a wide range of topics from pop culture to media to
politics and economics. In addition to
his written work, Rushkoff educates audiences about these topics by giving
lectures around the world and serving as the technology and media commentator
for CNN. Throughout his work, Douglas Rushkoff focuses on “the ways people,
cultures, and institutions create, share, and influence each other's values”
(Rushkoff.com). This focus comes through in Rushkoff’s analysis of the
evolution of advertising, and the way effective advertising today focuses on
the audience’s psychology.
Rushkoff’s
article, “Advertising,” appears in his book Coercion:
Why We Listen to What “They” Say. In
this piece, Rushkoff describes how advertising has changed overtime and the different
tactics that have successfully and unsuccessfully been employed by various
companies and advertising agencies. Rushkoff asserts that today’s advertising
is no longer like “a coercive attack on an unsuspecting public, but more like
an art form struggling for life” (Rushkoff 165). He believes that audiences
have become skeptical of advertisers and resistant to demographic targeting and
emotional appeals that they feel trample individuality. Rushkoff describes a
better alternative of “psychographic targeting.” He claims that rather than
categorizing individuals by demographics, advertiser’s today are successful by
appealing to individual values and aspirations (Rushkoff 178).
Although
Rushkoff’s cited examples of effective and ineffective advertising campaigns
suggest that psychographic targeting is the best type of advertising, we must
remain skeptical of his claim and continue to examine a wider range of
advertising examples to see their impact. Rushkoff’s article, “Advertising,” is
in a book about psychological coercion; therefore, it is in his interest as an
academic to present examples of advertising that completely back up his claim. In this book, Rushkoff is trying to convince
the public that authority figures “do the thinking for us” (Rushkoff.com). He
uses this article to explain that advertisers psychologically analyze their
audiences and often use reverse psychology to convince people what they want
and who they want to be. We should be
wary that Rushkoff has the power to hand pick examples for his articles to back
up his academic agenda. In addition,
when evaluating the applicability and worth of Rushkoff’s argument we must take
into account that this article was published in 1999. With the steady rise of the Internet, social
media, and various other technological progresses, advertising has evolved
tremendously in the past 14 years. Rushkoff’s analysis of advertising is
therefore outdated and does not account for these innovations.
Coercion has received high praise, such as the
2002 McLuhan Award for Best Media Book and high consumer reviews (Rushkoff.com).
However, it is the critiques of this book and further commentary on advertising
that refute Rushkoff’s claims that may be most valuable when evaluating this
article. For example, today, demographic targeting has proven to be very
effective by using individual’s activity on the Internet and geographic
location to find groups of people to target with specific advertising. This successful advertising tactic counters
Rushkoff’s argument. Douglas Rushkoff is
a credible author and this article makes very compelling claims, but we must
not also fall victim to coercion by accepting his argument without critically
looking at differing viewpoints on this subject.
Works Cited
Rushkoff,
Douglas. "Advertising." Coercion: Why We Listen to What
"they" Say. New York: Riverhead, 1999. N. pag. Print.
Rushkoff, Douglas. N.p.. Web. 20 Oct
2013. <http://www.rushkoff.com/>.
No comments:
Post a Comment